When hiring programmers, a lot of recruiters, particularly those that don’t have a technical background, usually struggle with determining the true capacity of their candidates, often ending up with aspirants who have barely enough coding skills—and they are already up for an interview. This is why your technical hiring process must include programming assessment test, first and foremost. To avoid time-consuming and inefficient recruitment, you need to sift through your candidates and make sure that only those with the right technical qualifications can make it through the final stages of your onboarding process.

While there can really be no one-size-fits-all approach or sure shot formula for success when it comes to technical recruitment, a programming assessment test is a great tool to help you separate the best candidates from those who still need to work on their technical skills. Fortunately for recruiters, there are numerous online tools that you can explore, along with different testing products and systems that are specifically designed to help companies in screening candidates.

There are programs that provide simple testing tasks like writing code for a basic problem. Online compilers are designed to automatically evaluate codes submitted and tell you, the recruiter results of the assessment. These kinds of tools are easy enough to use and understand even by those who don’t have much technical background. Other tools use multiple questions and keystroke detectors, while more advanced systems provide candidate feedback and have the ability to generate comprehensive reports or even provide remote testing and monitoring capabilities to prevent impersonation while performing a remote assessment.

With online coding and programming assessment test systems and tools, you can look well beyond what is written in your candidates’ resumes, while standardizing assessment and eliminating under-qualified applicants early on in your recruitment process. These tools also help you scale your search while cutting your costs.